On the impossibility of surviving (iterated) deletion of weakly dominated strategies in rational MPC
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- A complete characterization of game-theoretically fair, multi-party coin toss
- Bridging Game Theory and Cryptography: Recent Results and Future Directions
- Cryptography and game theory
- Cryptography and Game Theory: Designing Protocols for Exchanging Information
- Distributed computing meets game theory
- Dominance rationality: a unified approach
- Dominated strategies and common knowledge
- Efficient rational secret sharing in standard communication networks
- Fair computation with rational players
- Game theoretic notions of fairness in multi-party coin toss
- Game theory meets network security and privacy
- Game-theoretic fairness meets multi-party protocols: the case of leader election
- How to share a secret
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5485554 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1759774 (Why is no real title available?)
- Lexicographic rationalizability and iterated admissibility
- Limits on the power of cryptographic cheap talk
- Rational secret sharing and multiparty computation
- Rational Secret Sharing, Revisited
- Rationality and Adversarial Behavior in Multi-party Computation
- Secret-Sharing Schemes: A Survey
- Towards a game theoretic view of secure computation
- Utility dependence in correct and fair rational secret sharing
This page was built for publication: On the impossibility of surviving (iterated) deletion of weakly dominated strategies in rational MPC
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6581796)