Excess decay for minimizing hypercurrents \, 2Q

From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:6604004)
Excess decay for minimizing hypercurrents \(\bmod \, 2Q\)





The paper under review naturally follows two previous papers, by four of the authors, namely, [\textit{C. De Lellis} et al., Geom. Funct. Anal. 30, No. 5, 1224--1336 (2020; Zbl 1456.49032)], and [\textit{C. De Lellis} et al., Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 75, No. 1, 83--127 (2022; Zbl 1500.49026)]. In its contents there are considered area minimizing currents mod an integer \(p\geq2\) which have codimension \(1\) in a given \(C^2\) Riemannian ambient manifold. \NThe authors make use of some methods of above mentioned papers, altogether with another previous paper: [\textit{C. De Lellis} and \textit{E. Spadaro}, Geom. Funct. Anal. 24, No. 6, 1831--1884 (2014; Zbl 1307.49043)]. \N\NThey prove through their main results, stated as Theorems 1.2 and 1.3, an excess-decay estimate towards the unique tangent cone at every point where at least one such tangent cone is \(Q\) copies of a single plane, here \(p = 2Q\). \NOne should mention at this point that in a recent paper by \textit{P. Minter} and \textit{N. Wickramasekera} [J. Am. Math. Soc. 37, No. 3, 861--927 (2024; Zbl 1542.53016)], a result similar to the crucial Theorem 1.2 has also been handled by different means. This result has also partially been considered in an another paper by \textit{C. De Lellis} et al. [``Fine structure of the singular set of area minimizing hypersurfaces modulo $p$, Preprint, \url{arXiv:2201.10204}], \Nwhile here the striking result, Theorem 1.3, has its proof (Section 3) based in two central decay propositions, the first of them Proposition 3.2, which has its proof in Section 5 and is based on Lemma 5.1 and Proposition 4.3, and second of them is the fundamental Proposition 3.3, see also [Minter and Wickramasekera, loc.cit.], where a similar decay statement has been proved as a consequence of a theory for stable varifolds. The long and delicate proof of Proposition 3.3 is divided into many sections, from section 6 to section 13, whereby several tools introduced by the authors in previous articles, for instance from the second article [Zbl 1500.49026] quoted above under more stringent conditions are suitably adapted, and extended in the paper, in order to conform with the new technical difficulties presented in distinct ways.











This page was built for publication: Excess decay for minimizing hypercurrents \(\bmod \, 2Q\)

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6604004)