Uncertainty in the design stage of two-stage Bayesian propensity score analysis
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:6627422)
Cites work
- A Note on the Efficiency of Sandwich Covariance Matrix Estimation
- A note on using the estimated versus the known propensity score to estimate the average treatment effect
- A two-step Bayesian approach for propensity score analysis: simulations and case study
- A weighting analogue to pair matching in propensity score analysis
- Approximate Bayesian inference for doubly robust estimation
- Balancing covariates via propensity score weighting
- Bayesian propensity scores for high-dimensional causal inference: a comparison of drug-eluting to bare-metal coronary stents
- Calibrated Bayes, for statistics in general, and missing data in particular
- Cuts in Bayesian graphical models
- Cutting feedback in Bayesian regression adjustment for the propensity score
- For objective causal inference, design trumps analysis
- Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects
- Matching Using Estimated Propensity Scores: Relating Theory to Practice
- Model feedback in Bayesian propensity score estimation
- Modularization in Bayesian analysis, with emphasis on analysis of computer models
- Multiple Imputation After 18+ Years
- Multiple imputation: a review of practical and theoretical findings
- The Central Role of Bayes’ Theorem for Joint Estimation of Causal Effects and Propensity Scores
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
Cited in
(2)
This page was built for publication: Uncertainty in the design stage of two-stage Bayesian propensity score analysis
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6627422)
