Variable step size does not harm second-order integrators for Hamiltonian systems
Nonlinear ordinary differential equations and systems (34A34) Dynamical aspects of finite-dimensional Hamiltonian and Lagrangian systems (37J99) Mesh generation, refinement, and adaptive methods for ordinary differential equations (65L50) Two-body problems (70F05) Hamilton's equations (70H05) Geometry and quantization, symplectic methods (81S10) Numerical methods for initial value problems involving ordinary differential equations (65L05) Numerical investigation of stability of solutions to ordinary differential equations (65L07)
- Does variable step size ruin a symplectic integrator?
- The Development of Variable-Step Symplectic Integrators, with Application to the Two-Body Problem
- Variable time step integration with symplectic methods
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 556480
- Numerical experiments on the efficiency of second-order mixed-variable symplectic integrators for \(N\)-body problems
- Does variable step size ruin a symplectic integrator?
- Numerical experiments on the efficiency of second-order mixed-variable symplectic integrators for \(N\)-body problems
- Lack of dissipativity is not symplecticness
- Variable step size destabilizes the Störmer/leapfrog/Verlet method
- The rate of error growth in Hamiltonian-conserving integrators
- Performance of variable step size methods for solving model separable Hamiltonian systems
- The Chebyshev methods of Panovsky and Richardson as Runge-Kutta-Nyström methods
- The Development of Variable-Step Symplectic Integrators, with Application to the Two-Body Problem
- Adaptive Hamiltonian variational integrators and applications to symplectic accelerated optimization
- Symplectic variable step size integration for \(N\)-body problems
This page was built for publication: Variable step size does not harm second-order integrators for Hamiltonian systems
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q686574)
