Simple proof of a criterion for cones in R^ 3
A subset \(S\) of \(\mathbb{R}^ d\) is a cone if and only if it is the union of closed halflines with a common endpoint. A point \(x\) in \(S\) is clearly \(R\)-visible via \(S\) from a point \(y\) if and only if there exists a neighbourhood \(N\) of \(x\) such that all closed halflines issuing from \(y\) through all points of \(N\cap S\) lie in \(S\). An alternative short proof of the following earlier criterion for cones is given: If every two local nonconvexity points of a closed connected and nonconvex set \(S\) in \(\mathbb{R}^ 3\) are clearly \(R\)-visible via \(S\) from a common point of \(S\), then \(S\) is a cone.
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1870576
- On the cone multiplier in \(\mathbb R^3\)
- Projectionally exposed cones in \(R^ 3\)
- Proof of the Hénon-Lane-Emden conjecture in \(\mathbb{R}^3\)
- A proof of the Khavinson conjecture in \(\mathbb{R}^3\)
- A criterion for a variety to be a cone
- On some basic properties of cones with proofs independent of Zorn’s Lemma
- A counterexample on the closedness of the convex hull of a closed cone in \({\mathbb R}^n\).
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3927925
This page was built for publication: Simple proof of a criterion for cones in \(\mathbb{R}^ 3\)
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q689812)
