The \(C_ \ell\) Bailey transform and Bailey lemma

From MaRDI portal
Publication:690355

DOI10.1007/BF01204652zbMath0805.33019WikidataQ125053237 ScholiaQ125053237MaRDI QIDQ690355

Stephen C. Milne, Glenn M. Lilly

Publication date: 31 January 1995

Published in: Constructive Approximation (Search for Journal in Brave)




Related Items (23)

Expansion formulas for multiple basic hypergeometric series over root systemsNonterminating q-Whipple Transformations for Basic Hypergeometric Series in U(n)Consequences of the \(A_ l\) and \(C_ l\) Bailey transform and Bailey lemma\(U(n+1)\) WP-Bailey treeBailey flows and Bose-Fermi identities for the conformal coset models \((A^{(1)}_1)_N\times (A^{(1)}_1)_{N^\prime}/ (A^{(1)}_1)_{N+N^\prime{}}\)The $\bal $\ and $\bcl $\ Bailey Transform and LemmaBalanced \(_ 3\phi_ 2\) summation theorems for \(U(n)\) basic hypergeometric seriesOn certain multiple Bailey, Rogers and Dougall type summation formulasHall-Littlewood polynomials and characters of affine Lie algebrasKarlsson--Minton type hypergeometric functions on the root system \(C_{n}\)On Bailey pairs for \(\mathcal{N} = 2\) supersymmetric gauge theories on \(S_b^3/\mathbb{Z}_r\)Multiple expansion formulas over root systemsElliptic beta integrals and modular hypergeometric sums: An overview.Multidimensional matrix inversions and elliptic hypergeometric series on root systemsMultilateral inversion of \(A_{r}\), \(C_{r}\), and \(D_{r}\) basic hypergeometric seriesA \(U(n + 1)\) Bailey latticeOn Warnaar's elliptic matrix inversion and Karlsson--Minton-type elliptic hypergeometric seriesA new multivariable \(_{6 } \psi _{6 }\) summation formulaNew infinite families of exact sums of squares formulas, Jacobi elliptic functions, and Ramanujan’s tau functionSome applications of Gasper's bibasic summationCertain applications of WP-Bailey pairsThe \(C_n\) WP-Bailey chainA new multidimensional matrix inverse with applications to multiple \(q\)-series




Cites Work




This page was built for publication: The \(C_ \ell\) Bailey transform and Bailey lemma