Comparing composite likelihood methods based on pairs for spatial Gaussian random fields

From MaRDI portal
Publication:69394

DOI10.1007/S11222-014-9460-6zbMATH Open1332.62368arXiv1305.5594OpenAlexW1969543134MaRDI QIDQ69394FDOQ69394

Carlo Gaetan, Carlo Gaetan, Moreno Bevilacqua

Publication date: 16 March 2014

Published in: Statistics and Computing (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In the last years there has been a growing interest in proposing methods for estimating covariance functions for geostatistical data. Among these, maximum likelihood estimators have nice features when we deal with a Gaussian model. However maximum likelihood becomes impractical when the number of observations is very large. In this work we review some solutions and we contrast them in terms of loss of statistical efficiency and computational burden. Specifically we focus on three types of weighted composite likelihood functions based on pairs and we compare them with the method of covariance tapering. Asymptotics properties of the three estimation methods are derived. We illustrate the effectiveness of the methods through theoretical examples, simulation experiments and by analysing a data set on yearly total precipitation anomalies at weather stations in the United States.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1305.5594




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (27)

Uses Software





This page was built for publication: Comparing composite likelihood methods based on pairs for spatial Gaussian random fields

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q69394)