Calculus versus topology: comprehension versus abstraction
This is a comment on [\textit{U. Höhle}, ``Topological aspects of non-convergent sequences - a comment on Burgin's concept of fuzzy limits, Fuzzy Sets Syst. 149, No. 3, 399-412 (2005; Zbl 1092.26023)]. The authors accept Höhle's comment as ``a fair mathematical paper with interesting results. They justify their renunciation of topology by their emphasis on simplicity and comprehension. Not commented by the authors is Höhle's reproach that Burgin's statements often ``have more to do with an oracle than with clear scientific information. What is neoclassical analysis, what is fuzzy mathematics?
- Topological aspects of non-convergent sequences -- a comment on Burgin's concept of fuzzy limits
- Neoclassical analysis: calculus closer to the real world
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1231582
- On fuzzy analysis and fuzzy calculus
- Doing Without Turing Machines: Constructivism and Formal Topology
- Fuzzy conditional convergence and nearness relations
- General approach to continuity measures
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2044704 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1776321 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 6026995 (Why is no real title available?)
- Neoclassical analysis: Fuzzy continuity and convergence
- Theory of fuzzy limits
This page was built for publication: Calculus versus topology: comprehension versus abstraction
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q705509)