The lack of cross-validation can lead to inflated results and spurious conclusions: a re-analysis of the MacArthur violence risk assessment study

DOI10.1007/s00357-018-9252-3zbMath1391.62112OpenAlexW2789549032WikidataQ130050005 ScholiaQ130050005MaRDI QIDQ724609

Ehsan Bokhari, Lawrence J. Hubert

Publication date: 26 July 2018

Published in: Journal of Classification (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-018-9252-3

zbMATH Keywords

cross-validationrandom forestsclassification treesmisclassification costsreplicabilityviolence prediction

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects) (62H30) Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence (68T05)

Uses Software

• R
• SPSS
• AppliedPredictiveModeling
• ElemStatLearn

Cites Work

• Bagging predictors
• Applied Predictive Modeling
• An Introduction to Statistical Learning
• Random forests
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item

This page was built for publication: The lack of cross-validation can lead to inflated results and spurious conclusions: a re-analysis of the MacArthur violence risk assessment study