The lack of cross-validation can lead to inflated results and spurious conclusions: a re-analysis of the MacArthur violence risk assessment study

DOI10.1007/S00357-018-9252-3zbMATH Open1391.62112OpenAlexW2789549032WikidataQ130050005 ScholiaQ130050005MaRDI QIDQ724609FDOQ724609

Authors: Ehsan Bokhari, Lawrence Hubert 

Publication date: 26 July 2018

Published in: Journal of Classification (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-018-9252-3

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1112418
• Cross-Validation of Regression Models
• Cross-validation methods
• An application of 5-fold cross validation on a binary logistic regression model
• Tracking cross-validated estimates of prediction error as studies accumulate

zbMATH Keywords

random forestsreplicabilitycross-validationclassification treesmisclassification costsviolence prediction

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects) (62H30) Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence (68T05)

Cites Work

• An introduction to statistical learning. With applications in R
• Title not available (Why is that?)
• Random forests
• Bagging predictors
• Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems?
• Applied predictive modeling

Cited In (3)

• Prediction scoring of data-driven discoveries for reproducible research
• Using cross-validation methods to select time series models: promises and pitfalls
• Comparison of adult offense prediction methods based on juvenile offense trajectories using cross-validation

Uses Software

• R
• SPSS
• AppliedPredictiveModeling
• ElemStatLearn

This page was built for publication: The lack of cross-validation can lead to inflated results and spurious conclusions: a re-analysis of the MacArthur violence risk assessment study

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q724609)