The lack of cross-validation can lead to inflated results and spurious conclusions: a re-analysis of the MacArthur violence risk assessment study

DOI10.1007/S00357-018-9252-3MaRDI QIDQ724609zbMATH OpenOpenAlexWikidataFDO

Authors Ehsan Bokhari, Lawrence Hubert

Publication date 26 July 2018

Published in Journal of Classification (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-018-9252-3

zbMATH Keywords

random forestsreplicabilitycross-validationclassification treesmisclassification costsviolence prediction

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Classification and discrimination; cluster analysis (statistical aspects) (62H30) Learning and adaptive systems in artificial intelligence (68T05)

Recommendations

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1112418
• Cross-Validation of Regression Models
• Cross-validation methods
• An application of 5-fold cross validation on a binary logistic regression model
• Tracking cross-validated estimates of prediction error as studies accumulate

Cites work

• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3860199 (Why is no real title available?)
• An introduction to statistical learning. With applications in R
• Applied predictive modeling
• Bagging predictors
• Do we need hundreds of classifiers to solve real world classification problems?
• Random forests

Cited in

(3)

• Comparison of adult offense prediction methods based on juvenile offense trajectories using cross-validation
• Prediction scoring of data-driven discoveries for reproducible research
• Using cross-validation methods to select time series models: promises and pitfalls

Describes a project that uses

Uses Software

• ElemStatLearn
• AppliedPredictiveModeling
• SPSS
• R

This page was built for publication: The lack of cross-validation can lead to inflated results and spurious conclusions: a re-analysis of the MacArthur violence risk assessment study

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q724609)