Monads and comonads on module categories

From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:734798)




Abstract: Let A be a ring and MA the category of A-modules. It is well known in module theory that for any A-bimodule B, B is an A-ring if and only if the functor otimesAB:MAoMA is a monad (or triple). Similarly, an A-bimodule C is an A-coring provided the functor otimesAC:MAoMA is a comonad (or cotriple). The related categories of modules (or algebras) of otimesAB and comodules (or coalgebras) of otimesAC are well studied in the literature. On the other hand, the right adjoint endofunctors HomA(B,) and HomA(C,) are a comonad and a monad, respectively, but the corresponding (co)module categories did not find much attention so far. The category of HomA(B,)-comodules is isomorphic to the category of B-modules, while the category of HomA(C,)-modules (called C-contramodules by Eilenberg and Moore) need not be equivalent to the category of C-comodules. The purpose of this paper is to investigate these categories and their relationships based on some observations of the categorical background. This leads to a deeper understanding and characterisations of algebraic structures such as corings, bialgebras and Hopf algebras. For example, it turns out that the categories of C-comodules and HomA(C,)-modules are equivalent provided C is a coseparable coring. Furthermore, a bialgebra H over a commutative ring R is a Hopf algebra if and only if HomR(H) is a Hopf bimonad on MR and in this case the categories of H-Hopf modules and mixed HomR(H,)-bimodules are both equivalent to MR.



Cites work


Cited in
(48)






This page was built for publication: Monads and comonads on module categories

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q734798)