Why the Hamilton operator alone is not enough
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:735181)
Abstract: In the many worlds community seems to exist a belief that the physics of a quantum theory is completely defined by it's Hamilton operator given in an abstract Hilbert space, especially that the position basis may be derived from it as preferred using decoherence techniques. We show, by an explicit example of non-uniqueness, taken from the theory of the KdV equation, that the Hamilton operator alone is not sufficient to fix the physics. We need the canonical operators p, q as well. As a consequence, it is not possible to derive a "preferred basis" from the Hamilton operator alone, without postulating some additional structure like a "decomposition into systems". We argue that this makes such a derivation useless for fundamental physics.
Recommendations
- On a recent attempt to define the interpretation basis in the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics
- Non-Hermitian Hamiltonians in decoherence and equilibrium theory
- Overcomplete basis for one-dimensional Hamiltonians
- On defining the Hamiltonian beyond quantum theory
- Worlds in the Everett interpretation
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 44609 (Why is no real title available?)
- A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I
- Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves
- Korteweg-deVries equation, I. Global existence of smooth solutions
- Method for Solving the Korteweg-deVries Equation
- On schizophrenic experiences of the neutron or why we should believe in the many‐worlds interpretation of quantum theory
- Solving the measurement problem: de Broglie-Bohm loses out to Everett
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: Why the Hamilton operator alone is not enough
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q735181)