Solving the measurement problem: de Broglie-Bohm loses out to Everett

DOI10.1007/S10701-004-2009-3zbMATH Open1086.81004arXivquant-ph/0403094OpenAlexW3102550199WikidataQ55896746 ScholiaQ55896746MaRDI QIDQ816133FDOQ816133

Authors: Harvey R. Brown, David Wallace 

Publication date: 20 February 2006

Published in: Foundations of Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: The quantum theory of de Broglie and Bohm solves the measurement problem, but the hypothetical corpuscles play no role in the argument. The solution finds a more natural home in the Everett interpretation.

Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0403094

Recommendations

• Empty Waves in Bohmian Quantum Mechanics
• Everett's ``many-worlds proposal
• Bohmian mechanics and the meaning of the wave function
• Can the two-time interpretation of quantum mechanics solve the measurement problem?
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1971744

zbMATH Keywords

measurementdecoherenceconsciousnessEverettDe Broglie-Bohm

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

General and philosophical questions in quantum theory (81P05) Quantum measurement theory, state operations, state preparations (81P15) Stochastic mechanics (including stochastic electrodynamics) (81P20)

Cites Work

• A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of "Hidden" Variables. I
• Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty
• Everett and structure
• Time, quantum mechanics, and decoherence.
• Worlds in the Everett interpretation
• On a recent attempt to define the interpretation basis in the many worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics

Cited In (23)

• Maudlin's challenge refuted: A reply to Lewis
• The status of our ordinary three dimensions in a quantum universe
• Quantum probabilities as degrees of belief
• Can the two-time interpretation of quantum mechanics solve the measurement problem?
• How to measure the quantum measure. In memory of David Ritz Finkelstein
• Pure quantum interpretations are not viable
• The general-relativistic case for super-substantivalism
• Do we have any viable solution to the measurement problem?
• A proposal for a Bohmian ontology of quantum gravity
• Why scientific realists should reject the second dogma of quantum mechanics
• Black hole evaporation: information loss but no paradox
• Interpretive analogies between quantum and statistical mechanics
• One world, one beable
• Why the Hamilton operator alone is not enough
• Measurement and quantum dynamics in the minimal modal interpretation of quantum theory
• A phenomenological solution to the measurement problem? husserl and the foundations of quantum mechanics
• Bohmian trajectories and the ether: where does the analogy fail?
• Complementarity and scientific rationality
• Wave-functionalism
• Gravitational reduction of the wave function based on Bohmian quantum potential
• Obituary for a flea
• Empty Waves in Bohmian Quantum Mechanics
• Dissolving the measurement problem is not an option for the realist

This page was built for publication: Solving the measurement problem: de Broglie-Bohm loses out to Everett

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q816133)