Minding the is-ought gap

DOI10.1007/S10992-012-9253-3zbMATH Open1341.03006OpenAlexW2037967623MaRDI QIDQ742474FDOQ742474

Authors: Campbell Brown 

Publication date: 18 September 2014

Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-012-9253-3

Recommendations

• Recent thought on is and ought: connections, confluences and rediscoveries
• The is-ought problem. An investigation in philosophical logic
• Truthmaking and the is-ought gap
• Beall-ing \(\mathbb{O}\)
• Hume's is-ought thesis in logics with alethic-deontic bridge principles

zbMATH Keywords

autonomy of ethicsis-ought

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Cites Work

• Three uses of the Herbrand-Gentzen theorem in relating model theory and proof theory
• The is-ought problem. An investigation in philosophical logic

Cited In (4)

• Truthmaking and the is-ought gap
• Is, ought, and cut
• Recent thought on is and ought: connections, confluences and rediscoveries
• Beall-ing \(\mathbb{O}\)

This page was built for publication: Minding the is-ought gap

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q742474)