Is, ought, and cut

DOI10.1007/s10992-023-09701-yMaRDI QIDQ6166130

Norbert Gratzl, Edi Pavlović

Publication date: 2 August 2023

Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

zbMATH Keywords

sequent calculussubformula propertydeontic logicsis-ought argumentSpecial Hume Thesis

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Mathematical logic and foundations (03-XX)

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Unnamed Item
• Does the deduction theorem fail for modal logic?
• Minding the is-ought gap
• The is-ought problem. An investigation in philosophical logic
• A theory of truthmaker content. I: Conjunction, disjunction and negation
• A theory of truthmaker content. II: Subject-matter, common content, remainder and ground
• Deontic modals: why abandon the default approach
• How to prove Hume's law
• Truthmaking and the is-ought gap
• Proof Analysis
• Cut Elimination in the Presence of Axioms

This page was built for publication: Is, ought, and cut