On when a semantics is not a semantics: some reasons for disliking the Routley-Meyer semantics for relevance logic

DOI10.1007/BF00258440zbMATH Open0416.03022OpenAlexW2168302543MaRDI QIDQ754182FDOQ754182

B. Jack Copeland

Publication date: 1979

Published in: Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00258440

zbMATH Keywords

negationrelevance logicentailmentRoutley-Meyer semanticsrelevant implicationphilosophicalAnderson-Belnap systemsparadoxes of strict implication

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05) Modal logic (including the logic of norms) (03B45)

Cited In (19)

• Relation algebras of Sugihara, Belnap, Meyer, and Church
• A relevant logic of questions
• Logical predictivism
• Two, Three, Four, Infinity: The Path to the Four-Valued Logic and Beyond
• Arrows Pointing at Arrows: Arrow Logic, Relevance Logic, and Relation Algebras
• RELEVANCE LOGIC AND THE CALCULUS OF RELATIONS
• Bridging the Two Plans in the Semantics for Relevant Logic
• Strong paraconsistency and the basic constructive logic for an even weaker sense of consistency
• Disjunction and negation in information based semantics
• The Relevance of Relevance to Relevance Logic
• What is computation?
• Informational semantics as a third alternative?
• A reinterpretation of the semilattice semantics with applications
• Relevant logic and the theory of information
• Subminimal negation on the Australian plan
• What is a relevant connective?
• Understanding negation implicationally in the relevant logic R
• Prior, translational semantics, and the Barcan formula
• Paraconsistent logics?

This page was built for publication: On when a semantics is not a semantics: some reasons for disliking the Routley-Meyer semantics for relevance logic

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q754182)