Scaling binary comparison matrices: A comment on Narasimhan's proposal and other methods
From MaRDI portal
Publication:760317
DOI10.1016/0165-0114(84)90100-3zbMATH Open0554.90001OpenAlexW1986554596MaRDI QIDQ760317FDOQ760317
Authors: David V. Budescu
Publication date: 1984
Published in: Fuzzy Sets and Systems (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(84)90100-3
Recommendations
- Balancing pairwise comparison matrices by transitive matrices
- MATRIX BALANCING PROBLEM AND BINARY AHP(<Special Issue>the 50th Anniversary of the Operations Research Society of Japan)
- Ranking alternatives - comparison of different methods based on binary comparison matrices
- A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices
- The geometric mean procedure for estimating the scale of a judgement matrix
Theory of fuzzy sets, etc. (03E72) Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50) Decision theory (91B06)
Cites Work
Cited In (6)
- New parametric prioritization methods for an analytical hierarchy process based on a pairwise comparison matrix
- A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices
- A note on consistent adjustments of pairwise comparison judgments
- A multicriteria evaluation of methods for obtaining weights from ratio- scale matrices
- Estimating criterion weights using eigenvectors: A comparative study
- The geometric consistency index: approximated thresholds
This page was built for publication: Scaling binary comparison matrices: A comment on Narasimhan's proposal and other methods
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q760317)