Geometric presentations of classical knot groups
Summary: The question addressed by this paper is, how close is the tunnel number of a knot to the minimum number of relators in a presentation of the knot group? A dubious, but useful conjecture is that these two invariants are equal. (The analogous assertion applied to 3-manifolds is known to be false [\textit{J. M. Montesinos}, Low dimensional topology and Kleinian groups, Symp. Warwick and Durham 1984, Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser. 112, 241-252 (1986; Zbl 0619.57003)].) It has been shown recently [\textit{M. Boileau}, \textit{M. Rost}, and \textit{H. Zieschang}, Math. Ann. 279, No.3, 553-581 (1988; Zbl 0616.57008)] that not all presentations of a knot group are ``geometric. The main result in this paper asserts that the tunnel number is equal to the minimum number of relators among presentations satisfying a somewhat restrictive condition, that is, that such presentations are always geometric.
- Structure in the classical knot concordance group
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2187157 (Why is no real title available?)
- Presentation length and Simon's conjecture
- TUNNEL NUMBER ONE KNOTS HAVE PALINDROME PRESENTATIONS
- Construction of High Dimensional Knot Groups From Classical Knot Groups
- Knots and classical 3-geometries
- Critical point theory in knot complements
This page was built for publication: Geometric presentations of classical knot groups
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q805006)
