Is there an axiomatic semantics for standard pure Prolog?
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:805224)
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3866574 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 19144 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 43398 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 176531 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3466489 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3484054 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4185011 (Why is no real title available?)
- A Machine-Oriented Logic Based on the Resolution Principle
- A deterministic prolog fixpoint semantics
- Closures and fairness in the semantics of programming logic
- Complete extension of general logic programs
- Contributions to the Theory of Logic Programming
- Declarative modeling of the operational behavior of logic languages
- Denotational and operational semantics for prolog
- Is there an axiomatic semantics for standard pure Prolog?
- Negation in logic programming
- Negation in rule-based database languages: A survey
- Operational and denotational semantics of prolog
- Simple operational and denotational semantics for Prolog with cut
- Sémantique logique et dénotationnelle des interpréteurs PROLOG
- The Semantics of Predicate Logic as a Programming Language
Cited in
(5)
This page was built for publication: Is there an axiomatic semantics for standard pure Prolog?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q805224)