Generalized Tate cohomology.
Let \(R\) be an associative ring with identity. Given two classes of (left) \(R\)-modules, one contained in the other, we can construct the corresponding relative homology theories by viewing the two classes as relative projectives. If an \(R\)-module \(M\) has a relative projective resolution in each theory, then the identity map on \(M\) admits a lifting to the resolutions (in the direction from the smaller to the larger class). The standard cone-cylinder diagram gives rise to an exact sequence of complexes, going from the target resolution, via the mapping cone of the comparison, to the source resolution shifted by 1. Choosing an arbitrary coefficient module \(N\) and applying the functor \(\Hom(-,N)\), one obtains a long cohomology exact sequence. It is of interest because of the cohomology of the middle complex. The author calls it ``generalized Tate cohomology. The motivation comes from one of the results in the paper which shows that, when the smaller class consists of absolute projectives, the larger class consists of Gorenstein projectives, and if \(M\) is of finite Gorenstein projective dimension, then this cohomology coincides with Tate cohomology in positive degrees. (In the opinion of the reviewer, such a name is not justified, as the new cohomology is only defined in nonnegative degrees, and thus misses the entire nonpositive part of Tate cohomology.) Under these assumptions, the long cohomology exact sequence becomes of the same type as the sequence obtained earlier by Avramov-Martsinkovsky, in the sense that it connects the same cohomology groups in the same order. In fact, the author claims that the two sequences are the same, but, in the paper, the reviewer could not find any proof of the functoriality (with respect to the maps in the sequences) for the cohomology theories in question. On the other hand, if the constructed map between generalized Tate cohomology and Tate cohomology is indeed a map of sequences (say, with respect to the identity maps on the other two cohomology theories), then there is no longer any need to prove that it is an isomorphism -- this would immediately follow from the 5-lemma. In the last section, the author proves dual results (replacing Gorenstein projectives by Gorenstein injectives). In particular, she establishes the balance property of Tate cohomology for arbitrary modules over an arbitrary Gorenstein ring.
- Avramov-Martsinkovsky type exact sequences with \(\mathrm {Tor}\) functors
- Relative cohomology and generalized Tate cohomology
- Tate cohomology for complexes with finite Gorenstein AC-injective dimension
- Balance of complete cohomology in extriangulated categories
- Remarks on balance for Tate and generalized Tate (co)homology
- On Gorenstein injective discrete modules over profinite groups.
- Gorenstein complexes and recollements from cotorsion pairs
- Tate homology of modules of finite Gorenstein flat dimension.
- Relative derived categories
- Shifted generic cohomology.
- Relative and Tate homology with respect to semidualizing modules
- Representing Tate cohomology of G-spaces
- Dimension of complexes related to special Gorenstein projective precovers
- On right orthogonal classes and cohomology over Ding-Chen rings
- Fibrations and Tate conjecture.
- Relative homological algebra in the category of quasi-coherent sheaves.
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2221044 (Why is no real title available?)
- Generalized Tate cohomology and Avramov–Martsinkovsky type sequences
This page was built for publication: Generalized Tate cohomology.
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q820175)
