An inequality paradox: relative versus absolute indices?
From MaRDI portal
Publication:824975
DOI10.1007/S40300-021-00206-9zbMATH Open1483.62191OpenAlexW3153664403MaRDI QIDQ824975FDOQ824975
Authors: Satya R. Chakravarty, Palash Sarkar
Publication date: 16 December 2021
Published in: Metron (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40300-021-00206-9
Recommendations
Applications of statistics to economics (62P20) Statistical methods; economic indices and measures (91B82)
Cites Work
- The Class of Additively Decomposable Inequality Measures
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Probability and random processes.
- A proposal of poverty measures based on the Bonferroni inequality index
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A single-parameter generalization of the Gini indices of inequality
- Generalized Gini inequality indices
- Unequal inequalities. I, II
- Inequality, polarization and poverty. Advances in distributional analysis
- Intermediate inequality: Concepts, indices, and welfare implications
- The role of exchangeability in inference
- Homogeneity of Subpopulations and Simpson's Paradox
- The logic of Simpson's paradox
- On Simpson's Paradox and the Sure-Thing Principle
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- Contrasting the Gini and Zenga indices of economic inequality
- Title not available (Why is that?)
- A note on measures of distance between income distributions
- Inequalities for the Gini coefficient of composite populations
- The ubiquity of the Simpson's paradox
- When different market concentration indices agree
- On the generalization and decomposition of the Bonferroni index
- The Simpson's paradox in quantum mechanics
- New perspectives on the Gini and Bonferroni indices of inequality
Cited In (4)
This page was built for publication: An inequality paradox: relative versus absolute indices?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q824975)