Algebraic connections vs. algebraic D-modules: inverse and direct images
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:838405)
Algebraic connections vs. algebraic \(\mathcal D\)-modules: inverse and direct images
Algebraic connections vs. algebraic \(\mathcal D\)-modules: inverse and direct images
Abstract: In the dictionary between the language of (algebraic integrable) connections and that of (algebraic) -modules, to compare the definitions of inverse images for connections and -modules is easy. But the comparison between direct images for connections (the classical construction of the Gauss-Manin connection for smooth morphisms) and for -modules, although known to specialists, has been explicitly proved only recently in a paper of Dimca, Maaref, Sabbah and Saito in 2000, where the authors' main technical tool was M. Saito's equivalence between the derived category of -modules and a localized category of differential complexes. The aim of this short paper is to give a simplified summary of the [DMSS] argument, and to propose an alternative proof of this comparison which is simpler, in the sense that it does not use Saito equivalence. Moreover, our alternative strategy of comparison works in a context which is a precursor to the Gauss-Manin connection (at the level of -modules, for a morphism ), and may be of some intrinsic interest.
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4046107 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3322751 (Why is no real title available?)
- Dwork cohomology and algebraic \(\mathcal D\)-modules
- Equations différentielles à points singuliers réguliers
- Nilpotent connections and the monodromy theorem: Applications of a result of Turrittin
- Notes on Crystalline Cohomology. (MN-21)
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: Algebraic connections vs. algebraic \(\mathcal D\)-modules: inverse and direct images
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q838405)