Investment and consumption without commitment

From MaRDI portal
Publication:841650

DOI10.1007/S11579-008-0014-6zbMATH Open1177.91123arXiv0708.0588OpenAlexW2138562182MaRDI QIDQ841650FDOQ841650


Authors: Ivar Ekeland, Traian A. Pirvu Edit this on Wikidata


Publication date: 18 September 2009

Published in: Mathematics and Financial Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Abstract: In this paper, we investigate the Merton portfolio management problem in the context of non-exponential discounting. This gives rise to time-inconsistency of the decision-maker. If the decision-maker at time t=0 can commit his/her successors, he/she can choose the policy that is optimal from his/her point of view, and constrain the others to abide by it, although they do not see it as optimal for them. If there is no commitment mechanism, one must seek a subgame-perfect equilibrium strategy between the successive decision-makers. In the line of the earlier work by Ekeland and Lazrak we give a precise definition of equilibrium strategies in the context of the portfolio management problem, with finite horizon, we characterize it by a system of partial differential equations, and we show existence in the case when the utility is CRRA and the terminal time T is small. We also investigate the infinite-horizon case and we give two different explicit solutions in the case when the utility is CRRA (in contrast with the case of exponential discount, where there is only one). Some of our results are proved under the assumption that the discount function h(t) is a linear combination of two exponentials, or is the product of an exponential by a linear function.


Full work available at URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.0588




Recommendations




Cites Work


Cited In (only showing first 100 items - show all)





This page was built for publication: Investment and consumption without commitment

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q841650)