Noise and bias in eliciting preferences
From MaRDI portal
Publication:843715
DOI10.1007/S11166-009-9081-1zbMATH Open1187.91064OpenAlexW2036924402MaRDI QIDQ843715FDOQ843715
Authors: John D. Hey, Andrea Morone, Ulrich Schmidt 
Publication date: 15 January 2010
Published in: Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/3967
Recommendations
- Asymmetric noise and systematic biases: a new look at the trade-off method
- Varieties of risk preference elicitation
- Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions
- Error propagation in the elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions
- Eliciting risk preferences using choice lists
Cites Work
- Investigating Generalizations of Expected Utility Theory Using Experimental Data
- Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty
- A microeconometric test of alternative stochastic theories of risky choice
- `Stochastically more risk averse': a contextual theory of stochastic discrete choice under risk
- Stochastic expected utility theory
- The Predictive Utility of Generalized Expected Utility Theories
- Generalized expected utility, heteroscedastic error, and path dependence in risky choice
- Stochastic utility theorem
- Investigation of stochastic preference theory using experimental data
- Are preference reversals errors? An experimental investigation
- Just who are you calling risk averse?
- On the validity of the random lottery incentive system
- The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments
- Expected utility theory and prospect theory: One wedding and a decent funeral
- Causes of Allais common consequence paradoxes: an experimental dissection
- Violations of the independence axiom in common ratio problems: An experimental test of some competing hypotheses
- Do subjects separate (or are they sophisticated)?
- An experimental investigation of violations of transitivity in choice under uncertainty
- Which error story is best?
Cited In (11)
- Alternative non-market value-elicitation methods: Are the underlying preferences the same?
- Measuring risk aversion with lists: a new bias
- Nuclear emergency decision support: a behavioural OR perspective
- Asymmetric noise and systematic biases: a new look at the trade-off method
- How sure are you? — the properties of self-reported conviction in the elicitation of health preferences with discrete choice experiments
- The effect of bi-criteria conflict on matching-elicited preferences
- Estimating individual and group preference functionals using experimental data
- All at once! A comprehensive and tractable semi-parametric method to elicit prospect theory components
- Varieties of risk preference elicitation
- Eliciting welfare preferences from behavioural data sets
- On reference dependence and complementary symmetry
This page was built for publication: Noise and bias in eliciting preferences
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q843715)
