The directional dimension of subanalytic sets is invariant under bi-Lipschitz homeomorphisms

From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:848130)



Abstract: Let A subset R^n be a set-germ at 0 in R^n such that 0 is in the closure of A. Let D(A) denote the set of all directions of A at 0 in R^n. Let A, B subsets R^n be subanalytic set-germs at 0 in R^n such that 0 belongs to their closure. We study the problem of whether the dimension of the common direction set, called their kissing dimension, is preserved by a bi-Lipschitz homeomorphism. We show that in general it is not preserved. We prove that the kissing dimension is preserved if the images of the subanalytic sets under consideration are also subanalytic. In particular, if two subanalytic set-germs are bi-Lipschitz equivalent, then their direction sets must have the same dimension.


Let \(A\) be a subanalytic set-germ at \(0\in \mathbb{R}^{n}\) such that \(0\in \bar{A}.\) The authors find a new invariant of \(A\) under bi-Lipschitz homeomorphisms. Namely, it is the dimension of the direction set \(D(A)\) of \(A \) at \(0\). By definition it is the set of \(r\in S^{n-1}\) for which there exists a sequence of \(x_{i}\in A\setminus \{0\}\) such that \(x_{i}\to 0\) and \(x_i /\|x_i\| \to r\) (it is the intersection of a Whitney tangent cone to \(A\) at \(0\) with the unit sphere).



Cites work









This page was built for publication: The directional dimension of subanalytic sets is invariant under bi-Lipschitz homeomorphisms

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q848130)