Selective assessment of judgmental inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons for group decision rating

DOI10.1016/J.COR.2005.05.037MaRDI QIDQ858289zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Frej Limayem, Bernard Yannou

Publication date 9 January 2007

Published in Computers \& Operations Research (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2005.05.037

zbMATH Keywords

decision-makinginconsistencylogarithmic least squares regressionpairwise comparison

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Management decision making, including multiple objectives (90B50)

Recommendations

• A method for dealing with inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons
• FAIR CONSISTENCY EVALUATION FOR RECIPROCAL RELATIONS AND IN GROUP DECISION MAKING
• Group incomplete paired comparisons with account of expert competence
• Some notes on the properties of inconsistency indices in pairwise comparisons
• Preferences and consistency issues in group decision making

Cites work

• A model for the relative importance of the criteria in the multiplicative AHP and SMART
• A note on consistent adjustments of pairwise comparison judgments
• A note on the analysis of subjective judgement matrices
• A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures
• Generalization of the RCGM and LSLR pairwise comparison methods
• Generating consensus priority point vectors: A logarithmic goal programming approach
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3841083 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3873094 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1089212 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 895063 (Why is no real title available?)
• Measurement and preference function modelling
• Multi-criteria decision analysis with fuzzy pairwise comparisons
• Reciprocal distributions in the analytic hierarchy process
• The geometric consistency index: approximated thresholds
• Visualizing group decisions in the analytic hierarchy process.

Cited in

(15)

• Aggregation of direct and indirect judgments in pairwise comparison matrices with a re-examination of the criticisms by Bana e Costa and Vansnick
• Methods of determining group opinion using pairwise comparisons. Analysis of properties and application aspects
• Group incomplete paired comparisons with account of expert competence
• A method for dealing with inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons
• Shorter prediction intervals for anonymous individual assessments in group decision-making via pairwise comparisons
• A framework of incorporating confidence levels to deal with uncertainty in pairwise comparisons
• Seeking consistency with paired comparisons: a systems approach
• A study on the anonymity of pairwise comparisons in group decision making
• Boundary properties of the inconsistency of pairwise comparisons in group decisions
• FAIR CONSISTENCY EVALUATION FOR RECIPROCAL RELATIONS AND IN GROUP DECISION MAKING
• Stochastic pairwise comparative judgements and direct ratings of alternatives in the REMBRANDT system
• Measuring Group Differences in High‐Dimensional Choices: Method and Application to Congressional Speech
• Detecting and debugging erroneous statements in pairwise comparison matrices
• Resilient heuristic aggregation of judgments in the pairwise comparisons method
• Optimization model for reducing inconsistency of pairwise comparison matrices with minimal change

This page was built for publication: Selective assessment of judgmental inconsistencies in pairwise comparisons for group decision rating

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q858289)