Empirical likelihood calibration estimation for the median treatment difference in observational studies
From MaRDI portal
Publication:901533
DOI10.1016/j.csda.2010.09.012zbMath1328.62035OpenAlexW2021555036MaRDI QIDQ901533
Publication date: 12 January 2016
Published in: Computational Statistics and Data Analysis (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2010.09.012
Related Items (2)
The specification of the propensity score in multilevel observational studies ⋮ Empirical likelihood based weighted GMM estimation with missing response at random
Uses Software
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Quantile Treatment Effects
- Empirical likelihood for estimating equations with missing values
- Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations
- Empirical likelihood-based inference under imputation for missing response data
- Optimal calibration estimators in survey sampling
- Empirical Likelihood-Based Estimation of the Treatment Effect in a Pretest–Posttest Study
- Partially linear models with missing response variables and error-prone covariates
- Efficient and Doubly Robust Imputation for Covariate-Dependent Missing Responses
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects
- Empirical likelihood-based inference in linear errors-in-covariables models with validation data
- Bahadur representations of the empirical likelihood quantile processes
- On the Role of the Propensity Score in Efficient Semiparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects
- Empirical-Likelihood-Based Inference in Missing Response Problems and Its Application in Observational Studies
- Empirical Likelihood Inference in Nonlinear Errors-in-Covariables Models With Validation Data
- Measurement Error Models with Auxiliary Data
- A Generalization of Sampling Without Replacement From a Finite Universe
This page was built for publication: Empirical likelihood calibration estimation for the median treatment difference in observational studies