Does context matter more for hypothetical than for actual contributions? evidence from a natural field experiment
From MaRDI portal
Publication:945035
Recommendations
- Is hypothetical bias universal? Validating contingent valuation responses using a binding public referendum
- Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation
- Further investigation of voluntary contribution contingent valuation: Fair share, time of contribution, and respondent uncertainty
- Do people behave in experiments as in the field?--evidence from donations
- The impact of downward social information on contribution decisions
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 194744 (Why is no real title available?)
- Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment
- Does context matter more for hypothetical than for actual contributions? evidence from a natural field experiment
- Framing effects in public goods experiments
- How people respond to contingent valuation questions: A verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation
- Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games
- The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice
- Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods
Cited in
(4)
This page was built for publication: Does context matter more for hypothetical than for actual contributions? evidence from a natural field experiment
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q945035)