Does context matter more for hypothetical than for actual contributions? evidence from a natural field experiment

DOI10.1007/s10683-007-9194-9zbMath1151.91389OpenAlexW2142160768MaRDI QIDQ945035

Fredrik Carlsson, Francisco Alpizar, Olof Johansson-Stenman

Publication date: 10 September 2008

Published in: Experimental Economics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL: http://hdl.handle.net/2077/19167

zbMATH Keywords

AnonymityConformityEnvironmental valuationNatural field experimentStated preference methodsVoluntary contributions

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Environmental economics (natural resource models, harvesting, pollution, etc.) (91B76) Experimental studies (91A90)

Related Items

``Giving in to social pressure, Reputation and influence in charitable giving: an experiment, Does context matter more for hypothetical than for actual contributions? evidence from a natural field experiment, Introduction to field experiments in economics with applications to the economics of charity

Uses Software

• Stata

Cites Work

• Unnamed Item
• Does context matter more for hypothetical than for actual contributions? evidence from a natural field experiment
• Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods
• Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games
• Framing effects in public goods experiments
• How people respond to contingent valuation questions: A verbal protocol analysis of willingness to pay for an environmental regulation
• The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
• Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment