Exact Unconditional Sample Sizes for the 2 × 2 Binomial Trial
From MaRDI portal
Publication:95646
DOI10.2307/2981892zbMath0585.62101OpenAlexW2801040323MaRDI QIDQ95646
Jonathan J. Shuster, Samy Suissa, Samy Suissa, Jonathan J. Shuster
Publication date: 1985
Published in: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General) (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2307/2981892
powerancillary statisticcontingency tablesFisher's exact testconditionality principlebinomial samplesExact attained significance levelexact unconditional testssample size methodstwo by twounconditional Z statistic
Related Items (38)
Implications of random cut-points theory for the Mann-Whitney and binomial tests ⋮ The exact unconditionalz-pooled test for equality of two binomial probabilities: optimal choice of the Berger and Boos confidence coefficient ⋮ Optimal correction for continuity and conditions for validity in the unconditional chi-squared test ⋮ Exact sample size determination for the ratio of two incidence rates under the Poisson distribution ⋮ Choosing the optimal unconditioned test for comparing two independent proportions ⋮ On predicting repair times in a minimal repair process ⋮ Optimal exact tests for multiple binary endpoints ⋮ BayesianP-Values for Testing Independence in 2 × 2 Contingency Tables ⋮ A simple comparison of two sequences of probabilities ⋮ On analysis of epidemiological data involving a 2×2 contingency table: an overview of fisher's exact test and yates' correction for continuity ⋮ Exact-Corrected Confidence Interval for Risk Difference in Noninferiority Binomial Trials ⋮ Using Survey Sampling Algorithms For Exact Inference in Logistic Regression ⋮ Comparison of tests for association of 2 × 2 tables under multiple testing setting ⋮ Information and learning in oligopoly: an experiment ⋮ A more powerful test for comparing two Poisson means ⋮ The \(2\times2\) table: A discussion from a Bayesian viewpoint. ⋮ Reducing conservatism of exact small-sample methods of inference for discrete data ⋮ Optimal testing strategies for large, sparse multinomial models ⋮ Exact ⋮ Exact power and sample size for vaccine efficacy studies ⋮ Dealing with discreteness: making `exact’ confidence intervals for proportions, differences of proportions, and odds ratios more exact ⋮ Proving non-inferiority or equivalence of two treatments with dichotomous endpoints using exact methods ⋮ Test‐Based Exact Confidence Intervals for the Difference of Two Binomial Proportions ⋮ Which Exact Test is More Powerful in Testing the Hardy–Weinberg Law? ⋮ Improvedp-Value Tests for Comparing Two Independent Binomial Proportions ⋮ On Small-Sample Confidence Intervals for Parameters in Discrete Distributions ⋮ EXACTP-VALUES FOR DISCRETE MODELS OBTAINED BY ESTIMATION AND MAXIMIZATION ⋮ Exact Unconditional Inference for Risk Ratio in a Correlated 2 × 2 Table with Structural Zero ⋮ A Cautionary Note on Exact Unconditional Inference for a Difference between Two Independent Binomial Proportions ⋮ Nonconservative exact small-sample inference for discrete data ⋮ Exact Meta-Analysis Approach for Discrete Data and its Application to 2 × 2 Tables With Rare Events ⋮ Exact unconditional distributions for dichotomous data in many-to-one comparisons. ⋮ Exact Confidence Intervals, Based on the Z Statistic, for the Difference Between Two Proportions ⋮ Exact Confidence Intervals, Based on the Z Statistic, for the Difference Between Two Proportions ⋮ Exact likelihood ratio test of independence of binary responses within clusters. ⋮ On determining the \(P\)-value in \(2\times 2\) multinomial trials ⋮ Approximating power of the unconditional test ⋮ Approximate and Fiducial Confidence Intervals for the Difference Between Two Binomial Proportions
This page was built for publication: Exact Unconditional Sample Sizes for the 2 × 2 Binomial Trial
