Gibbsianness and non-Gibbsianness in divide and color models

DOI10.1214/09-AOP518MaRDI QIDQ989190zbMATH OpenFDO

Publication date 30 August 2010

Published in The Annals of Probability (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/0812.2399

divide and color models Gibbs measures non-Gibbsianness quasilocality random-cluster measures

Interacting random processes; statistical mechanics type models; percolation theory (60K35) Lattice systems (Ising, dimer, Potts, etc.) and systems on graphs arising in equilibrium statistical mechanics (82B20) Percolation (82B43)

Abstract: For parameters

p i n [0, 1]

and

q > 0

such that the Fortuin--Kasteleyn (FK) random-cluster measure

P h i_{p, q}^{m a t h b b Z^{d}}

for

m a t h b b Z^{d}

with parameters

p

and

q

is unique, the

q

-divide and color [

o p e r a t o r n a m e D a C (q)

] model on

m a t h b b Z^{d}

is defined as follows. First, we draw a bond configuration with distribution

P h i_{p, q}^{m a t h b b Z^{d}}

. Then, to each (FK) cluster (i.e., to every vertex in the FK cluster), independently for different FK clusters, we assign a spin value from the set

1, 2, ..., s

in such a way that spin

i

has probability

a_{i}

. In this paper, we prove that the resulting measure on spin configurations is a Gibbs measure for small values of

p

and is not a Gibbs measure for large

p

, except in the special case of

q i n 2, 3, ...

,

a_{1} = a_{2} = ... = a_{s} = 1 / q

, when the

o p e r a t o r n a m e D a C (q)

model coincides with the

q

-state Potts model.

Review text

The author considers model that is a slight generalization of the fractional fuzzy Potts model. For parameters \(p\in [0,1]\) and \(q>0\) such that the Fortuin-Kasteleyn random-cluster measure \(\Phi _{p,q}^{\mathbb{Z}^d}\) for \(\mathbb{Z}^d\) with parameters \(p\) and \(q\) is unique, the \(q\)-divide and color model on \(\mathbb{Z}^d\) is defined as follows: to each cluster independently it is assigned a spin value from the set \(\{1,2,\dots,s\}\) in a such way that spin \(i\) has probability \(a_i\). It is proved that the resulting measure for small values of \(p\) is a Cibbs measure and is not a Gibbs measure for large \(p,\) except in the special case of \(q\in \{2,3,\dots\}, a_1=a_2=\cdot\cdot\cdot=a_s=1/q,\) when considered model coincides with the \(q\)-state Potts model.

Recommendations

Cites work

Cited in

(6)

This page was built for publication: Gibbsianness and non-Gibbsianness in divide and color models

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q989190)