The tyranny of non-aggregation versus the tyranny of aggregation in social choices: a real dilemma

DOI10.1007/S00199-009-0462-0MaRDI QIDQ992050zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Bertil Tungodden, Marc Fleurbaey

Publication date 8 September 2010

Published in Economic Theory (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL http://hdl.handle.net/11250/298176

zbMATH Keywords

aggregationmaximinutilitarianismsocial choice

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Individual preferences (91B08) Social choice (91B14)

Recommendations

• The tyranny puzzle in social preferences: an empirical investigation
• Non-dictatorial extensive social choice
• A foundation for Pareto aggregation
• Social choice and the indexing dilemma
• Conundrums for nonconsequentialists

Cites work

• Concorcet's principle implies the no show paradox
• Responsibility and redistribution: the case of first best taxation

Cited in

(7)

• Bayesian social aggregation with non-Archimedean utilities and probabilities
• Thresholds, critical levels, and generalized sufficientarian principles
• Intergenerational equity and infinite-population ethics: a survey
• Rank-additive population ethics
• The tyranny puzzle in social preferences: an empirical investigation
• Repugnant conclusions
• Rawls's difference principle and maximin rule of allocation: a new analysis

This page was built for publication: The tyranny of non-aggregation versus the tyranny of aggregation in social choices: a real dilemma

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q992050)