Relations between communication complexity classes
The communication complexity of a Boolean function f equals the number of bits which have to be exchanged between two processors each knowing some part of the input x in order to compute f(x). This nonuniform complexity measure has found a lot of applications in complexity theory, e.g. in distributed computing, lower bounds for the VLSI complexity or monotone circuits. This paper is a major step in building a complexity theory on this complexity measure. Hence, a large number of results are proved. For most of the closure properties it is decided whether they are fulfilled. Perhaps even more important are hierarchy results, i.e. the result that a Boolean hierarchy does not collapse. Within these hierarchies also probabilistic complexity classes like the class C-BPP, the communication complexity counterpart of BPP, are investigated.
- Results on communication complexity classes
- Non-deterministic communication complexity with few witnesses
- Spectral methods for matrix rigidity with applications to size-depth trade-offs and communication complexity
- The landscape of communication complexity classes
- On relations between counting communication complexity classes
- Nondeterministic and randomized Boolean hierarchies in communication complexity
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3881884 (Why is no real title available?)
- On Toda’s Theorem in Structural Communication Complexity
- Lower bounds for the majority communication complexity of various graph accessibility problems
- Adventures in monotone complexity and TFNP
- The communication complexity of enumeration, elimination, and selection
- Unbounded-error quantum query complexity
- Nondeterministic and randomized Boolean hierarchies in communication complexity
This page was built for publication: Relations between communication complexity classes
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q751811)