Relative spinor class fields: a counterexample
From MaRDI portal
In previous papers, the author proved the existence of a representation field for certain orders in central simple algebras \(A\) over an algebraic number field \(K\). In the paper under review, it is shown that for \((A:K)\geq 9\), a representation field exists for every order in \(A\) if and only if the spinor class field has exponent 2 over \(K\).
Recommendations
- Spinors of spin-one-half fields
- Unveiling a spinor field classification with non-abelian gauge symmetries
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4210978
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 816134
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 822871
- Spinor fields in the nonsymmetric, non-Abelian Kaluza-Klein theory
- Spinors in non-relativistic Chern-Simons electrodynamics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4067821
- Spinor fields on 2+1 topologically nontrivial spacetime
- On a class of relativistic equations for fields with arbitrary spin
Cited in
(9)- Applications of spinor class fields: embeddings of orders and quaternionic lattices.
- Computing quaternion quotient graphs via representations of orders
- Eichler orders, trees and representation fields
- Representation fields for commutative orders
- On representations of spinor genera
- Maximal selectivity for orders in fields
- Representation fields for orders of small rank
- Representation fields for cyclic orders
- Spinor class fields for generalized Eichler orders
This page was built for publication: Relative spinor class fields: a counterexample
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q999106)
