Relevant restricted quantification
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3437108 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2150328 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1907195 (Why is no real title available?)
- An introduction to non-classical logic
- Classical relevant logics. I
- Four-valued semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals)
- How to be really contraction free
- The American plan completed: Alternative classical-style semantics, without stars, for relevant and paraconsistent logics
Cited in
(23)- The difficulties in using weak relevant logics for naive set theory
- Paradox and logical revision. A short introduction
- Paraconsistent or paracomplete?
- Restricted arrow
- Logic—The Big Picture
- A pragmatic dissolution of Curry's paradox
- Restriction by noncontraction
- Some Comments and Replies
- Paths to triviality
- Transfinite numbers in paraconsistent set theory
- Connexive restricted quantification
- Extensionality and restriction in naive set theory
- Indicative conditionals, restricted quantification, and naive truth
- Logical pluralism: another application for chunk and permeate
- Transfinite cardinals in paraconsistent set theory
- The nature of information: a relevant approach
- Adding the relevant restricted quantification
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 589743 (Why is no real title available?)
- Proof-theoretic pluralism
- Aristotelian diagrams for semantic and syntactic consequence
- Free of Detachment: Logic, Rationality, and Gluts
- Contradictory concepts
- Inclosure and intolerance
This page was built for publication: Relevant restricted quantification
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q853811)