Remarks on the Bergman kernel function of a worm domain
\textit{M. Christ} [J. Am. Math. Soc. 9, No. 4, 1171-1185 (1996)] proved that the Bergman projection operator of the so-called worm domain \(\Omega\) of \textit{K. Diederich} and \textit{J. E. Fornæss} [Math. Ann. 225, 275-292 (1977; Zbl 0333.32018)] fails to preserve the space \(C^\infty(\overline\Omega)\) of functions smooth up to the boundary. Building on this result, the author shows that the set \(A\) of points \(w\) in \(\Omega\) for which the Bergman kernel function \(K(z,w)\) of \(\Omega\) is smooth up to the boundary as a function of \(z\) is a small set: namely, \(A\) is contained in the zero set of a harmonic function (not identically zero) having polynomial growth at the boundary of \(\Omega\). In particular, \(A\) is contained in a closed, nowhere dense set. It would be interesting to know whether the set \(A\) is actually void.
- Variation of the Bergman kernel by cutting a hole
- A comparison between the Bergman and Szegö kernels of the non-smooth worm domain \(D'_{\beta }\)
- The Bergman kernel and projection on non-smooth worm domains
- Harmonic analysis of several complex variables: a survey
- New results on the Bergman kernel of the worm domain in complex space
- Analysis and geometry on worm domains
This page was built for publication: Remarks on the Bergman kernel function of a worm domain
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4398276)
