Replies to Part III Logical Revisionism

DOI10.1093/OSO/9780199278343.003.0014MaRDI QIDQ5137244zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Crispin Wright

Publication date 2 December 2020

Published in Logic, Language, and Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199278343.003.0014

zbMATH Keywords

harmonic argumentharmonyNeil TennantSanford Shiehscepticism

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60) History of mathematics in the 21st century (01A61) Biographies, obituaries, personalia, bibliographies (01A70) Philosophical and critical aspects of logic and foundations (03A05)

Recommendations

• Replies to Part I Frege and Logicism
• Revising logic in light of paradox
• Reconsidering logical positivism
• Replies to Part II Intuitionism and the Sorites
• Paradox and logical revision. A short introduction
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2150339
• A vindication of logicism
• The justification of the logical laws revisited
• Revising Logics

Cited in

(2)

• Wright and Revisionism
• A three-dart response to an argument of Bagemihl

This page was built for publication: Replies to Part III Logical Revisionism

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q5137244)