Responsibility in multi-step decision schemes

DOI10.1007/S10992-025-09794-7MaRDI QIDQ6987236zbMATH OpenFDO

Authors Q. Shi, Pavel Naumov

Publication date 7 May 2025

Published in Journal of Philosophical Logic (Search for Journal in Brave)

Copyright license Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

Full work available at URL https://doi.org/10.1007/S10992-025-09794-7

zbMATH Keywords

responsibilityresponsibility gapSTITundefinability

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Mathematical logic and foundations (03-XX)

Cites work

• A course in game theory.
• A logic for reasoning about counterfactual emotions
• A logical analysis of responsibility attribution: emotions, individuals and collectives
• A STIT-Extension of ATL
• ACTION TYPES IN STIT SEMANTICS
• Actual causality
• Agency and deontic logic
• Alternative axiomatics and complexity of deliberative STIT theories
• An epistemic logic of blameworthiness
• Axioms for deliberative stit
• Coalitional responsibility in strategic settings
• Counterfactual and seeing-to-it responsibilities in strategic games
• Deontic epistemic stit logic distinguishing modes of mens rea
• Games with Incomplete Information Played by “Bayesian” Players, I–III Part I. The Basic Model
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 796044 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3106184 (Why is no real title available?)
• Inference as doxastic agency. I: The basics of justification stit logic
• The deliberative stit: A study of action, omission, ability, and obligation
• The way of the agent
• Using STIT theory to talk about strategies

This page was built for publication: Responsibility in multi-step decision schemes

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q6987236)