Revisited experimental comparison of node-link and matrix representations
From MaRDI portal
Abstract: Visualizing network data is applicable in domains such as biology, engineering, and social sciences. We report the results of a study comparing the effectiveness of the two primary techniques for showing network data: node-link diagrams and adjacency matrices. Specifically, an evaluation with a large number of online participants revealed statistically significant differences between the two visualizations. Our work adds to existing research in several ways. First, we explore a broad spectrum of network tasks, many of which had not been previously evaluated. Second, our study uses a large dataset, typical of many real-life networks not explored by previous studies. Third, we leverage crowdsourcing to evaluate many tasks with many participants.
Recommendations
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1982193
- Evaluating Visualizations of Sets and Networks that Use Euler Diagrams and Graphs
- Controllable and Progressive Edge Clustering for Large Networks
- Visualization of citation networks for large science portals
- Data visualization through their graph representations
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2084318 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2086698 (Why is no real title available?)
- Public Key Cryptography - PKC 2005
- Smooth Projective Hashing and Two-Message Oblivious Transfer
- Smooth projective hashing and two-message oblivious transfer
Cited in
(3)
This page was built for publication: Revisited experimental comparison of node-link and matrix representations
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4625118)