Rings whose modules have maximal or minimal projectivity domain.
Free, projective, and flat modules and ideals in associative algebras (16D40) Simple and semisimple modules, primitive rings and ideals in associative algebras (16D60) Structure and classification for modules, bimodules and ideals (except as in 16Gxx), direct sum decomposition and cancellation in associative algebras) (16D70)
This paper was inspired by the definition and study of injectivity domains (as in \textit{A.~N. Alahmadi, M. Alkan} and \textit{S. López-Permouth}, [Glasg. Math. J. 52A, 7-17 (2010; Zbl 1228.16004)] and \textit{N. Er, S. López-Permouth} and \textit{N. Sökmez} [J. Algebra 330, No. 1, 404-417 (2011; Zbl 1227.16004)]). The dual concepts are defined here: For any (unital right) \(R\)-module \(M\), the projectivity domain of \(M\) is defined as \(\{N\in\text{Mod-}R:M\) is \(N\)-projective\}. A module \(M\) is said to be projectively poor (p-poor) if its projectivity domain consists of precisely the semisimple \(R\)-modules. If a ring \(R\) is such that every \(R\)-module is either projective or projectively poor, then \(R\) is said to have no (right) p-middle class.NEWLINENEWLINE Properties of p-poor modules are investigated first. For example, it is shown that if \(M_R\) is a p-poor module, then so is \(M\oplus N\) for all \(N\in\text{Mod-}R\). Restrictions are then placed on the ring. Semisimple Artinian rings are characterized in terms of p-poor \(R\)-modules. It is proved that every ring has a semisimple p-poor module. If \(R\) is semilocal, then \((R/J(R))_R\) is shown to be p-poor and if \(R\) is a right PCI-domain, then \(E(R)\) (and consequently every nonzero injective module) is p-poor.NEWLINENEWLINE Rings with no (right) p-middle class are studied next. The following results are found for a ring \(R\) with no right p-middle class: (1) For any two-sided ideal \(I\), \(R/I\) is semisimple Artinian or \(I\) is a direct summand of \(R\). (2) If \(J(R)\neq 0\), then \(R\) is semilocal (3) \(\text{Soc}(R_R)\) is a direct summand of \(R\) or \(R\) is semiartinian with Loewy length \(\leq 2\). (4) If \(J(R)\neq J(R)^2\), then \(J(R)=0\). (5) Factor rings of \(R\) have no right p-middle class. (6) \(R\) is either semiprimary with \(J(R)^2=0\) or semiprime. (7) \(R\) does not contain an infinite independent family of nonzero two-sided ideals. (8) \(R\) does not contain an infinite set of central orthogonal idempotents. (9) If \(R\) is also indecomposable, then \(\text{Soc}(R_R)\leq_eR\) with \(J(R)^2=0\) or \(\text{Soc}(R_R)=0\). (10) If \(R\) is indecomposable semiprime, and \(R\) is not a prime ring, then \(R\) is semisimple Artinian.NEWLINENEWLINE The main theorem states that every ring with no right p-middle class is the ring direct sum of a semisimple Artinian ring \(S\) and a ring \(K\) which is either zero or an indecomposable ring with exactly one of the following properties: (1) \(K\) is a semiprimary right SI-ring with \(J(K)\neq 0\), or (2) \(K\) is a semiprimary ring with \(\text{Soc}(K_K)=Z_r(K)=J(K)\neq 0\), or (3) \(K\) is a prime ring with \(\text{Soc}(K_K)=0\) and either \(J(K)=0\) or \(_KJ(K)\) and \(J(K)_K\) is infinitely generated, or (4) \(K\) is a prime right SI-ring with infinitely generated right socle.NEWLINENEWLINE Some examples are found of rings that have no right p-middle class, including QF-rings with unique simple module (up to isomorphism) and \(J(R)^2=0\).
- Hereditary QI-Rings
- Homological properties of the ring of differential polynomials
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 52201 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3491133 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3523780 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1236965 (Why is no real title available?)
- Modules with decompositions that complement direct summands
- Poor modules: the opposite of injectivity.
- Rings whose modules have maximal or minimal injectivity domains.
- Singular torsion and the splitting properties
- Structure of some Noetherian SI rings
- When are proper cyclics injective?
- Quasi-projective modules over prime hereditary Noetherian V-rings are projective or injective.
- Characterizing rings in terms of the extent of the injectivity and projectivity of their modules.
- Rings without a middle class from a lattice-theoretic perspective
- An alternative perspective on pure-projectivity of modules
- On the weak-injectivity profile of a ring
- An alternative perspective on projectivity of modules.
- Rings whose cyclic modules have restricted injectivity domains
- Poor modules: the opposite of injectivity.
- On Artinian rings with restricted class of injectivity domains.
- Modules and abelian groups with minimal (pure-) projectivity domains
- Rugged modules: the opposite of flatness
- On subprojectivity domains of g-semiartinian modules
- Some variations of projectivity
- Rings whose nonsingular right modules are $R$-projective
- RD-projective module whose subprojectivity domain is minimal
- On rings with one middle class of injectivity domains
- Rings whose modules have maximal or minimal subprojectivity domain
- Rings whose modules have maximal or minimal injectivity domains.
- On subinjectivity domains of RD-injective modules
- The opposite of injectivity by proper classes
- The isomorphism problem for basic modules and the divisibility profile of the algebra of polynomials
- Injectivity and projectivity domains of a simple module over a commutative ring
- Rings with singular modules having a restricted subprojectivity domain
- On flatly generated proper classes of modules
- Modules and abelian groups with a restricted domain of projectivity
- Projectivity and subprojectivity domains in exact categories
This page was built for publication: Rings whose modules have maximal or minimal projectivity domain.
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q418924)