Robustness to non-normality of various tests for the one-sample location problem
Summary: This paper studies the effect of the normal distribution assumption on the power and size of the sign test, Wilcoxon's signed rank test and the \(t\)-test when used in one-sample location problems. Power functions for these tests under various skewness and kurtosis conditions are produced for several sample sizes from simulated data using the \(g\)- and \(k\)-\,distributions of \textit{H. L. MacGillivray} and \textit{W. H. Cannon} [Generalizations of the \(g\)- and \(k\)-\,distributions and their use. Working paper (1998)].
- Robustness to non-normality of common tests for the many-sample location problem
- Preliminary Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Normality do not Validate the One-Sample Student t
- Application of the finite efficacy ratio for one-sample location
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3960756 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1216597 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1014736 (Why is no real title available?)
- One sample tests of location for nonnormal symmetric data
- A simple and effective decision rule for choosing a significance test to protect against non-normality
- A closer look at the effect of preliminary goodness-of-fit testing for normality for the one-sample \(t\)-test
- The most efficient linear combination of the sign and the Maesono tests for p-normal distributions
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 5019954 (Why is no real title available?)
- On the robusness of the one one samplettest
This page was built for publication: Robustness to non-normality of various tests for the one-sample location problem
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q556516)