Sequential tests and estimators after overrunning based on maximum-likelihood ordering
From MaRDI portal
Recommendations
- Incorporating data received after a sequential trial has stopped into the final analysis: implementation and comparison of methods
- Incorporating overrunning data into the analysis of both primary and secondary endpoints in a sequential trial
- Point and interval estimation following a sequential clinical trial
- Bias of estimates of secondary parameters in linear-boundary sequential tests
- Inference about a secondary process following a sequential trial
Cited in
(7)- Automated selection of r for the r largest order statistics approach with adjustment for sequential testing
- Incorporating data received after a sequential trial has stopped into the final analysis: implementation and comparison of methods
- Incorporating overrunning data into the analysis of both primary and secondary endpoints in a sequential trial
- On the bias of maximum likelihood estimation following a sequential test
- Point estimation for adaptive trial designs. I: A methodological review
- Design and analysis of group sequential trials for repeated measurements when pipeline data occurs: a tutorial
- Adaptive clinical trial designs with pre-specified rules for modifying the sample size: understanding efficient types of adaptation
This page was built for publication: Sequential tests and estimators after overrunning based on maximum-likelihood ordering
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q4455363)