Sets of integers that do not contain long arithmetic progressions

From MaRDI portal



Abstract: In 1946, Behrend gave a construction of dense finite sets of integers that do not contain 3-term arithmetic progressions. In 1961, Rankin generalized Behrend's construction to sets avoiding k-term arithmetic progressions, and in 2008 Elkin refined Behrend's 3-term construction. In this work, we combine Elkin's refinement and Rankin's generalization. Arithmetic progressions are handled as a special case of polynomial progressions. In 1946, Behrend gave a construction of dense finite sets of integers that do not contain a 3-term arithmetic progression (AP). In 1961, Rankin generalized Behrend's construction to sets avoiding k-term APs. In 2008, Elkin refined Behrend's 3-term construction, and later in 2008, Green & Wolf found a distinct approach (albeit morally similar) that is technically more straightforward. This work combines Elkin's refinement and Rankin's generalization in the Green & Wolf framework. A curious aspect of the construction is that we induct through sets that do not contain a long polynomial progression in order to construct a set without a long AP. The bounds for r_k(N), the largest size of a subset of {1,2,...,N} that does not contain a k element AP, are (where log=log_2, for sufficiently large N, with n=ceiling{log k}): r_3(N) > N (sqrt{360}/(e pi^{3/2})-epsilon) sqrt[4]{2log N} * 4^{-sqrt{2 log N}}, r_k(N) > CN 2^{-n 2^{(n-1)/2} sqrt[n]{log N}+frac{1}{2n}loglog N}. The improvement over earlier work is in the simplification of the construction, the explicitness of the bound for r_3, and in the loglog term for general k.


Summary: Combining ideas of Rankin, Elkin, Green and Wolf, we give constructive lower bounds for \(r_k(N)\), the largest size of a subset of \(\{1,2,\dots,N\}\) that does not contain a \(k\)-element arithmetic progression: For every \(\varepsilon>0\), if \(N\) is sufficiently large, then \[ r_3(N)\geq N \left(\frac{6\cdot 2^{3/4} \sqrt{5}}{e \,\pi^{3/2}}-\varepsilon\right) \exp\left({-\sqrt{8\log N}+\tfrac14\log\log N}\right), \] \[ r_k(N) \geq N \, C_k\,\exp\left({-n 2^{(n-1)/2} \sqrt[n]{\log N}+\tfrac{1}{2n}\log\log N}\right), \] where \(C_k>0\) is an unspecified constant, \(\log=\log_2\), \(\exp(x)=2^x\), and \(n=\lceil\log k\rceil\). These are currently the best lower bounds for all \(k\), and are an improvement over previous lower bounds for all \(k\neq 4\).




Cited in
(24)








This page was built for publication: Sets of integers that do not contain long arithmetic progressions

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q540042)