Some implications of the WP-Bailey tree

DOI10.1016/J.AAM.2009.02.001MaRDI QIDQ1030691zbMATH OpenOpenAlexFDO

Authors Peter Zimmer, James McLaughlin

Publication date 2 July 2009

Published in Advances in Applied Mathematics (Search for Journal in Brave)

Full work available at URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.04840

zbMATH Keywords

\(Q\)-seriesBailey chainsRogers-Ramanujan type indetitiesWP-Bailey pairsWP-Burge pairs

Mathematics Subject Classification ID

Combinatorial identities, bijective combinatorics (05A19) Binomial coefficients; factorials; (q)-identities (11B65) Basic hypergeometric functions in one variable, ({}_rphi_s) (33D15)

Abstract: We consider a special case of a WP-Bailey chain of George Andrews, and use it to derive a number of curious transformations of basic hypergeometric series. We also derive two new WP-Bailey pairs, and use them to derive some additional new transformations for basic hypergeometric series. Finally, we briefly consider the implications of WP-Bailey pairs\ $(alph{a}_n(a,k)$, $$, in which $alph{a}_n(a,k)$ is independent of $k$, for generalizations of identities of the Rogers-Ramanujan type.

Review text

The authors consider a special type of a WP-Bailey chain of \textit{G. E. Andrews} [NATO Sci. Ser. II, Math. Phys. Chem. 30, 1--22 (2001; Zbl 1005.33005)] and they use it to obtain several transformations for basic hypergeometric series. Also they derive two new WP-Bailey pairs which imply additional transformations for basic hypergeometric series. Then they consider the case of WP-Burge pairs (WP-Bailey pair \((a_n(p,k),b_n(p,k))\) in which \(a_n(p,k)\) does not depend on \(k\)) [see \textit{G. Andrews} and \textit{A. Berkovich}, J. Lond. Math. Soc., II. Ser. 66, No.~3, 529--549 (2002; Zbl 1049.33010)].

Recommendations

• General WP-Bailey chains
• The WP-Bailey Tree and its Implications
• Some identities between basic hypergeometric series deriving from a new Bailey-type transformation
• A reciprocity relation for WP-Bailey pairs
• A WP-Bailey lattice and its applications

Cites work

• A New Proof of Rogers's Transformations of Infinite Series
• A NOTE ON A TRANSFORMATION OF BAILEY
• Bailey's transform, lemma, chains and tree
• Extensions of the well-poised and elliptic well-poised Bailey lemma
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1827714 (Why is no real title available?)
• scientific article; zbMATH DE number 2117212 (Why is no real title available?)
• Identities of the Rogers-Ramanujan Type
• On a characteristic equation of well-poised Bailey chains
• Some identities for terminating q-series
• Some summations of q-series by telescoping.
• The Final Problem : An Account of the Mock Theta Functions
• The WP-Bailey Tree and its Implications
• Transformations between basic hypergeometric series on different bases and identities of Rogers-Ramanujan type

Cited in

(15)

• Lifting Bailey pairs to WP-Bailey pairs
• \(q\)-Gosper algorithm and simple Bailey pairs
• The \(C_n\) WP-Bailey chain
• \(U(n+1)\) WP-Bailey tree
• The WP-Bailey Tree and its Implications
• A reciprocity relation for WP-Bailey pairs
• On WP-Bailey pairs and transformation formulae for ordinary hypergeometric series
• A new transformation formula involving derived WP-bailey pair and its applications
• A WP-Bailey lattice and its applications
• Some new transformations for Bailey pairs and WP-Bailey pairs
• Andrews' type WP-Bailey lemma and its applications
• Generalizations of some q-product identities of Ramanujan and others
• A \(U(n+1)\) WP-Bailey lattice and its applications
• Some identities between basic hypergeometric series deriving from a new Bailey-type transformation
• General WP-Bailey chains

This page was built for publication: Some implications of the WP-Bailey tree

Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q1030691)