Generalized stable shape and duality (Q1841980)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Generalized stable shape and duality
scientific article

    Statements

    Generalized stable shape and duality (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    17 January 2002
    0 references
    In a previous paper the author and \textit{J. Segal} [Topology Appl. 63, No. 2, 139-164 (1995; Zbl 0831.55010)] introduced a generalized stable shape category \({\mathbf {Sh}}_{\text{spec}}\), containing topological spaces and CW-spectra as objects. The main result of the present paper is the following theorem: (1) For each compact metric space \(X\), there exists a CW-spectrum \(X^\ast\) and a natural isomorphism \(\tau: {\mathbf {Sh}}_{\text{spec}}(Y \wedge X, E) \rightarrow {\mathbf {Sh}}_{\text{spec}} (Y, X^\ast \wedge E)\), for any compact Hausdorff \(Y\) and CW-spectrum \(E\). This \((\cdot)^*\) assignment satisfies a certain (expected) functoriality property. There is a coshape category for spectra \({\mathbf {coSh}}_{\text{spec}}\) introduced, such that the following assertion holds: (2) For any compact metric spaces \(X\) and \(Y\) there exists an isomorphism \[ D:{\mathbf {Sh}}_{\text{spec}}(X,Y) \rightarrow {\mathbf {coSh}}_{\text{spec}}(Y^\ast , X^\ast). \] Result (1) is offered as a generalization of classical S-duality to more general spaces. In particular, the author emphasizes that his spaces \(X\) have not to be finite dimensional. As his predecessors he mentions earlier results by \textit{E. Lima} (1959) and \textit{H. W. Henn} (1981), ignoring the fact that there exists since several years a full S-duality for arbitrary subsets of an \(n\)-sphere by using {compact open strong shape} (so-called {coss-shape}) by the reviewer (having appeared in the same journal as the present paper and in Fundamenta). On the other hand, the author's main theorem does {not} describe a duality but only a kind of adjointness: The main property for a duality would be a natural isomorphism \((X^\ast)^\ast \approx X\) which, apart from the fact that \(E^\ast\) for a spectrum is not defined, can not be expected for objects of this generality, according to well-known basic counterexamples by J. M. Boardman and T. Y. Lin.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references