Parity in Bloch's conductor formula in even dimension (Q2483702)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Parity in Bloch's conductor formula in even dimension
scientific article

    Statements

    Parity in Bloch's conductor formula in even dimension (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    26 July 2005
    0 references
    Let \(X\) be a proper flat regular scheme over a complete discrete valuation ring \({\mathcal O}_k\) with perfect residue field \(F\) such that the generic fiber \(X_K\) is smooth. Let \(\ell\) be a prime number different from the characteristic of \(F\). The Artin conductor \(\text{Art}(X/{\mathcal O}_L)\) of \(X\) is defined to be \(\chi(X_{\overline K})-\chi(X_{\overline F})+\text{Sw}\,H^*(X_{\overline K},\mathbb Q_\ell)\), where \(\chi(\bullet)\) denotes the \(\ell\)-adic Euler number and \(\text{Sw\,}H^*(X_{\overline K},\mathbb Q_\ell)=\sum_q(-1)^q=\text{Sw\,}H^q(X_{\overline K},\mathbb Q_\ell)\) the alternating sum of the Swan conductor of the \(\ell\)-adic representations \(H^q(X_{\overline K},\mathbb Q_\ell)\) of the inertia subgroup \(I=\text{Gal}(\overline K/K^{nr})\). \textit{S. Bloch} [Duke Math. J. 54, 295--308 (1987; Zbl 0632.14018)] defined the self-intersection cycle \((\Delta_X,\Delta_X)_s\) to be a localized Chern class \((-1)^{(n+1)}c_{n+1}{}^X_{X_f}(\Omega^1_{X,{\mathcal O}_K})\in \text{CH}_0(X_F)\) with \(n=\dim X\) and proposed a conjectural formula \(\deg(\Delta_X,\Delta_X)_s =-\text{Art}(X/{\mathcal O}_K)\). In the present paper the author proves that the formula is valid modulo 2 under the assumption that the characteristic of \(K\) is not equal to two, \(n\) is even, and the reduced closed fiber is a divisor of \(X\) with normal crossing. His proof proceeds in three steps. Firstly, he shows \(\deg(\Delta_X,\Delta_X)_s\equiv \text{ord(disc\,} H^n_{\text{dR}} (X_K/K))\pmod2\), where ``disc'' means the discriminant of the symmetric nondegenerate bilinear form induced from the cup-product on the de Rham cohomology \(H^n_{\text{dR}}(X_K/K)\). Secondly he derives the congruence \(\text{ord(disc\,} H^n_{\text{dR}}(X_K/K))\equiv \text{Art(det\,}H^n(X_{\overline K}),\mathbb Q_\ell)\pmod2\) through the relation between the determinant of \(\ell\)-adic étale cohomology and the discriminant of the de Rham cohomology established in [\textit{T. Saito}, J. Algebr. Geom. 3, No.~3, 411--434 (1994; Zbl 0833.14011)]. Lastly, he deduces the congruence \(\text{Art}(\det H^n(X_{\overline K},\mathbb Q_\ell)\equiv \text{Art}(X/{\mathcal O}_K)\pmod 2\) from the computation of vanishing cycles given in [\textit{P. Deligne}, SGA7I, No. 1, Lect. Notes Math. 288, 1--24 (1972; Zbl 0267.14003)], and a theorem of \textit{J.-P. Serre} [Invent. Math. 14, 173--183 (1971; Zbl 0229.13006)] on the parity of Artin conductor of an orthogonal representation.
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references