Etingof's conjecture for quantized quiver varieties (Q2661169)

The class of symplectic reflection algebras was introduced by \textit{P. Etingof} and \textit{V. Ginzburg} in [Invent. Math. 147, No. 2, 243--348 (2002; Zbl 1061.16032)], which is an interesting class of associative algebras. Symplectic reflection algebras are filtered deformations of the skew-group algebras \(S(V)\)\#\(\Gamma\), where \(V\) is a symplectic vector space and \(\Gamma\) is a finite subgroup of \(\mathrm{Sp}(V)\). The symplectic reflection algebras \(\mathcal{H}_c\) associated to the pair \((V, \Gamma)\) form a family depending on a collection \(c\) of complex numbers. Let \(\Gamma_1\subseteq \mathrm{SL}_2(\mathbb{C})\) be a finite subgroup, and form the semidirect product \(\Gamma_n :=S_n\ltimes\Gamma^n_1\), where \(S_n\) is the symmetric group on \(n\) letters. \(\Gamma_n\) acts naturally on \(\mathbb{C}^{2n}\) by symplect morphisms. The symplectic reflection algebras \(\mathcal{H}_c\) associated to the pair \((\mathbb{C}^{2n}, \Gamma_n)\) depends on \(r\) parameters, where \(r\) is the number of conjugacy classes in \(\Gamma_1\), whereas for \(n = 1\), the number of parameters is \(r-1\). It is natural to ask the following question. How many finite dimensional irreducible representations does the algebra \(\mathcal{H}_c\) have? To answer to this question, \textit{P. Etingof} [Mosc. Math. J. 12, No. 3, 543--565 (2012; Zbl 1293.17030)] proposed a conjecture. In this paper, the authors prove Etingof's conjecture on counting finite dimensional irreducible representations for all groups \(\Gamma_1\). The authors solve this problem in the more general context. They compute the number of finite dimensional irreducible representations for the algebras quantizing Nakajima quiver varieties. They find a lower bound for all quivers and vectors of framing, and obtain an exact count in the case when the quiver is of finite type or it is of affine type and the framing is the coordinate vector at the extending vertex. This proves Etingof's conjecture. In order to achieve these results, the authors use several techniques, two important ones are categorical Kac-Moody actions and wall-crossing functors.