On the connected component of compact composition operators on the Hardy space (Q947774)

From MaRDI portal
scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the connected component of compact composition operators on the Hardy space
scientific article

    Statements

    On the connected component of compact composition operators on the Hardy space (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    7 October 2008
    0 references
    Let \(\mathbb{D}\) denote the open unit disc of the complex plane and \(\mathcal{H}^2\) the space of analytic functions \(f\) on \(\mathbb{D}\) for which the norm \(\|f\|_2=(\sup_{0 \leq r <1} \int_0^{2 \pi} |f(re^{i \theta})|^2 \frac{d \theta}{2 \pi})^{1/2}\) is finite. If \(\varphi\) is an analytic self-map of \(\mathbb{D}\), then the composition operator \(C_\varphi f = f \circ \varphi\) is a bounded linear operator on \(\mathcal{H}^2\). The properties of these operators on \(\mathcal{H}^2\) and many other function spaces have been studied extensively. In particular, \textit{J.\,H.\thinspace Shapiro} and \textit{C.\,Sundberg} [Pac.\ J.\ Math.\ 145, 117--152 (1990; Zbl 0732.30027)] considered compactness properties of the set of composition operators, Comp\((\mathcal{H}^2)\). It was observed that the collection of all compact composition operators on \(\mathcal{H}^2\) is arcwise connected. They raised the following question and conjectured that it had a positive answer: (\(\star\)) Do the compact composition operators form a connected component of the set Comp\((\mathcal{H}^2)\)? In fact, Shapiro and Sundberg suggested that two elements of Comp\((\mathcal{H}^2)\) lie in the same component of Comp\((\mathcal{H}^2)\) if and only if they have compact difference. Recently, \textit{J.\,Moorhouse} and \textit{C.\,Toews} [Contemp.\ Math.\ 321, 207--213 (2003; Zbl 1052.47018)] and, independently, \textit{P.\,S.\thinspace Bourdon} [J.~Math.\ Anal.\ Appl.\ 279, 228--245 (2003; Zbl 1043.47021)] answered this conjecture in the negative. In fact, they gave an example of two elements in Comp\((\mathcal{H}^2)\) whose difference is not compact, yet which are arc-connected. However, in the examples the operators are non-compact, so question (\(\star\)) was still open. The main result in the paper under review is a negative answer to (\(\star\)). More generally, the authors show: For \(0 \leq t \leq 1\), there are analytic maps \(\varphi_t: \mathbb{D} \to \mathbb{D}\) such that \(C_{\varphi_0}\) is compact and \(C_{\varphi_1}\) is non-compact on \(\mathcal{H}^p\), and \(t \mapsto C_{\varphi_t}\) is continuous from \([0,1]\) into Comp\((\mathcal{H}^p)\), where \(1 \leq p < \infty\). The map \(\varphi_1\) is of fairly complicated construction because of \textit{B.\,D.\thinspace MacCluer}'s result [Integral Equations Oper.\ Theory 12, 725--738 (1989; Zbl 0685.47027)] that, if two composition operators belong to the same component of Comp\((\mathcal{H}^2)\), then their symbols must have the same angular derivative at any point of the unit circle \(\partial \mathbb{D}\). The maps \(\varphi_t\) are defined in terms of Aleksandrov-Clark measures and an integral representation for composition operators due to \textit{D.\,Sarason} [Lect.\ Notes Pure Appl.\ Math.\ 122, 545--565 (1990; Zbl 0712.47026)] is used. Finally, the authors propose the following problem: Determine all the non-compact composition operators that lie in the component of the compact ones in Comp\((\mathcal{H}^2)\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    composition operator
    0 references
    Aleksandrov-Clark measures
    0 references
    compact operator
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references