Pages that link to "Item:Q1726415"
From MaRDI portal
The following pages link to Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches (Q1726415):
Displaying 12 items.
- Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: foundations and semantics (Q2060740) (← links)
- Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation using confirmation theory (Q2146004) (← links)
- Generalizing complete semantics to bipolar argumentation frameworks (Q2146009) (← links)
- Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities (Q2238615) (← links)
- Realizability of three-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks (Q2287192) (← links)
- Delegated updates in epistemic graphs for opponent modelling (Q2302776) (← links)
- Epistemic graphs for representing and reasoning with positive and negative influences of arguments (Q2303513) (← links)
- Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation based on defeasible rules (Q2671763) (← links)
- On searching explanatory argumentation graphs (Q4995618) (← links)
- Explainable acceptance in probabilistic and incomplete abstract argumentation frameworks (Q6080638) (← links)
- Syntactic reasoning with conditional probabilities in deductive argumentation (Q6108761) (← links)
- Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: an incremental approach (Q6579305) (← links)
