Pages that link to "Item:Q3537543"
From MaRDI portal
The following pages link to On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks (Q3537543):
Displaying 35 items.
- Complexity-sensitive decision procedures for abstract argumentation (Q490451) (← links)
- Lattices of fuzzy sets and bipolar fuzzy sets, and mathematical morphology (Q545330) (← links)
- AFRA: argumentation framework with recursive attacks (Q622279) (← links)
- Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties (Q646494) (← links)
- Combining argumentation and Bayesian nets for breast cancer prognosis (Q853792) (← links)
- An approach to abstract argumentation with recursive attack and support (Q901084) (← links)
- Inference procedures and engine for probabilistic argumentation (Q1678421) (← links)
- From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: a principled spectrum (Q1726355) (← links)
- Empirical evaluation of abstract argumentation: supporting the need for bipolar and probabilistic approaches (Q1726415) (← links)
- A characterization of types of support between structured arguments and their relationship with support in abstract argumentation (Q1748533) (← links)
- Modelling defeasible and prioritized support in bipolar argumentation (Q1935594) (← links)
- Mathematical morphology on bipolar fuzzy sets: general algebraic framework (Q1951291) (← links)
- Gödel semantics of fuzzy argumentation frameworks with consistency degrees (Q2130020) (← links)
- Addressing popular concerns regarding COVID-19 vaccination with natural language argumentation dialogues (Q2146003) (← links)
- Generalizing complete semantics to bipolar argumentation frameworks (Q2146009) (← links)
- Gradual semantics for weighted bipolar SETAFs (Q2146015) (← links)
- Revealed preference in argumentation: algorithms and applications (Q2237149) (← links)
- Meta-argumentation modelling. I: Methodology and techniques (Q2269509) (← links)
- Probabilistic abstract argumentation frameworks, a possible world view (Q2300457) (← links)
- A polynomial-time fragment of epistemic probabilistic argumentation (Q2302822) (← links)
- A comprehensive study of argumentation frameworks with sets of attacking arguments (Q2330011) (← links)
- Bipolarity in argumentation graphs: towards a better understanding (Q2353924) (← links)
- Bipolarity in temporal argumentation frameworks (Q2406902) (← links)
- Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks (Q2695523) (← links)
- Argumentation Theory and Decision Aiding (Q3058464) (← links)
- Hybrid Reasoning on a Bipolar Argumentation Framework (Q3297805) (← links)
- Open-Mindedness of Gradual Argumentation Semantics (Q3297812) (← links)
- Structural Analysis of Extension-Based Argumentation Semantics with Joint Acceptability (Q3305685) (← links)
- An introduction to bipolar representations of information and preference (Q3518731) (← links)
- On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks (Q3537543) (← links)
- Encompassing Attacks to Attacks in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks (Q3638140) (← links)
- Admissibility in Probabilistic Argumentation (Q5094045) (← links)
- On the Decomposition of Abstract Dialectical Frameworks and the Complexity of Naive-based Semantics (Q5145833) (← links)
- Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses (Q6116529) (← links)
- Probabilistic causal bipolar abstract argumentation: an approach based on credal networks (Q6133708) (← links)
