The following pages link to (Q4585837):
Displaying 42 items.
- Probabilistic argumentation: an approach based on conditional probability. A preliminary report (Q2055776) (← links)
- Paraconsistent inference relations induced from inconsistency measures (Q2105602) (← links)
- An abstract, logical approach to characterizing strong equivalence in non-monotonic knowledge representation formalisms (Q2124445) (← links)
- The degrees of monotony-dilemma in abstract argumentation (Q2146005) (← links)
- Constrained incomplete argumentation frameworks (Q2146007) (← links)
- Generalizing complete semantics to bipolar argumentation frameworks (Q2146009) (← links)
- Shedding new light on the foundations of abstract argumentation: modularization and weak admissibility (Q2163881) (← links)
- Argumentative explanations for interactive recommendations (Q2238596) (← links)
- Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities (Q2238615) (← links)
- Realizability of three-valued semantics for abstract dialectical frameworks (Q2287192) (← links)
- How we designed winning algorithms for abstract argumentation and which insight we attained (Q2289004) (← links)
- A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency (Q2294581) (← links)
- EMIL: extracting meaning from inconsistent language. Towards argumentation using a controlled natural language interface (Q2299238) (← links)
- On the graded acceptability of arguments in abstract and instantiated argumentation (Q2321325) (← links)
- A general notion of equivalence for abstract argumentation (Q2321336) (← links)
- Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems (Q2424889) (← links)
- Argument strength in probabilistic argumentation based on defeasible rules (Q2671763) (← links)
- Representing abstract dialectical frameworks with binary decision diagrams (Q2694565) (← links)
- The burden of persuasion in abstract argumentation (Q2695517) (← links)
- Extension-based semantics for incomplete argumentation frameworks (Q2695523) (← links)
- Inconsistency Measurement (Q3297796) (← links)
- Using Graph Convolutional Networks for Approximate Reasoning with Abstract Argumentation Frameworks: A Feasibility Study (Q3297798) (← links)
- Structural Analysis of Extension-Based Argumentation Semantics with Joint Acceptability (Q3305685) (← links)
- A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of <i>ASPIC</i><sup>+</sup> and <i>DeLP</i> (Q4957198) (← links)
- Logic Programming, Argumentation and Human Reasoning (Q5098742) (← links)
- Towards Evidence Retrieval Cost Reduction in Abstract Argumentation Frameworks with Fallible Evidence (Q5870514) (← links)
- Harnessing Incremental Answer Set Solving for Reasoning in Assumption-Based Argumentation (Q6063862) (← links)
- A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness (Q6066787) (← links)
- Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison (Q6097772) (← links)
- Integrated preference argumentation and applications in consumer behaviour analyses (Q6116529) (← links)
- A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation (Q6136108) (← links)
- On dynamics in structured argumentation formalisms (Q6488791) (← links)
- The Jiminy advisor: moral agreements among stakeholders based on norms and argumentation (Q6488793) (← links)
- Reasoning in assumption-based argumentation using tree-decompositions (Q6545531) (← links)
- A principle-based analysis of bipolar argumentation semantics (Q6545533) (← links)
- Minimality, necessity and sufficiency for argumentation and explanation (Q6548459) (← links)
- Change in quantitative bipolar argumentation: sufficient, necessary, and counterfactual explanations (Q6570290) (← links)
- Credulous acceptance in high-order argumentation frameworks with necessities: an incremental approach (Q6579305) (← links)
- An equivalence class of gradual semantics (Q6587908) (← links)
- On naive labellings -- realizability, construction and patterns of redundancy (Q6630191) (← links)
- How to manage supports in incomplete argumentation (Q6630206) (← links)
- An awareness epistemic framework for belief, argumentation and their dynamics (Q6642567) (← links)
