Pages that link to "Item:Q646494"

The following pages link to Instantiating abstract argumentation with classical logic arguments: postulates and properties (Q646494):

Displayed 30 items.

• Normal and strong expansion equivalence for argumentation frameworks (Q359982) ‎ (← links)
• Characterizing strong equivalence for argumentation frameworks (Q420788) ‎ (← links)
• Postulates for logic-based argumentation systems (Q465599) ‎ (← links)
• Theory of semi-instantiation in abstract argumentation (Q528522) ‎ (← links)
• Complexity of abstract argumentation under a claim-centric view (Q785236) ‎ (← links)
• An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation with priorities (Q899441) ‎ (← links)
• Classical logic, argument and dialectic (Q1711878) ‎ (← links)
• An argumentation-based approach for identifying and dealing with incompatibilities among procedural goals (Q1726335) ‎ (← links)
• Deductive argumentation by enhanced sequent calculi and dynamic derivations (Q1744402) ‎ (← links)
• A paraconsistent approach to deal with epistemic inconsistencies in argumentation (Q2146014) ‎ (← links)
• Computational complexity of flat and generic assumption-based argumentation, with and without probabilities (Q2238615) ‎ (← links)
• A review of the relations between logical argumentation and reasoning with maximal consistency (Q2294581) ‎ (← links)
• Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation -- a survey (Q2341832) ‎ (← links)
• On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics (Q2344367) ‎ (← links)
• Rich preference-based argumentation frameworks (Q2353975) ‎ (← links)
• An argumentation system for defeasible reasoning (Q2409094) ‎ (← links)
• Logical argumentation by dynamic proof systems (Q2424889) ‎ (← links)
• A QBF-based formalization of abstract argumentation semantics (Q2446545) ‎ (← links)
• Opposition Frameworks (Q2835871) ‎ (← links)
• Beyond Maxi-Consistent Argumentation Operators (Q2915089) ‎ (← links)
• Dialogue Games for Argumentation Frameworks with Necessities (Q3451166) ‎ (← links)
• Balancing Rationality and Utility in Logic-Based Argumentation with Classical Logic Sentences and Belief Contraction (Q4571144) ‎ (← links)
• Logical limits of abstract argumentation frameworks (Q4583317) ‎ (← links)
• Equivalence in logic-based argumentation (Q4583352) ‎ (← links)
• A Comparative Study of Some Central Notions of <i>ASPIC</i>⁺ and <i>DeLP</i> (Q4957198) ‎ (← links)
• A claim-centric perspective on abstract argumentation semantics: claim-defeat, principles, and expressiveness (Q6066787) ‎ (← links)
• Belief revision and computational argumentation: a critical comparison (Q6097772) ‎ (← links)
• The complexity landscape of claim-augmented argumentation frameworks (Q6099370) ‎ (← links)
• A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation (Q6136108) ‎ (← links)
• Weakest link in formal argumentation: lookahead and principle-based analysis (Q6139087) ‎ (← links)